<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2645-3460</Issn>
      <Volume></Volume>
      <Issue>In Press</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing and Mindset Intervention on Academic Self-Efficacy among Female Secondary School Students</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing and Mindset Intervention on Academic Self-Efficacy among Female Secondary School Students</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>15</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/xj27bb64</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>02</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose:&lt;/strong&gt; The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and a mindset intervention in improving academic self-efficacy among female secondary school students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods and Materials: &lt;/strong&gt;This study employed a quasi-experimental design with pretest, posttest, two-month follow-up, and control-group assessments. The statistical population consisted of female ninth-grade students enrolled in lower secondary schools in District 5 of Tehran during the 2024–2025 academic year. A total of 58 female students were randomly assigned to three groups: motivational interviewing (n = 19), mindset intervention (n = 19), and control (n = 20).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; The results indicated that the effects of motivational interviewing and the mindset intervention differed significantly in relation to the aptitude component (p = .033) and the total academic self-efficacy score (p = .001). Specifically, the mindset intervention produced greater increases in the mean aptitude-component score and the total academic self-efficacy score than motivational interviewing. Accordingly, it was concluded that there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and the mindset intervention in improving academic self-efficacy among female secondary school students, with the mindset intervention being more effective.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The mindset intervention was more effective than motivational interviewing in enhancing academic self-efficacy among female secondary school students and may therefore be used as a more efficient intervention for this population.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Academic self-efficacy</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">mindset</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">motivational interviewing</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://qijes.com/index.php/ijes/article/download/1514/1497</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
